The
silence of Armenian cultural heritage in Van
Mr. Mehmet Fatih GÜDEN, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University
Van once was the unofficial capital
of the Armenians living in Turkey. However, contrary to its long and embodied
history and legacy, there is no systematic research and information that reflects
the ancient existence of Armenians and their cultural heritage in the region.
However, the material culture rooted
in the Lake Van Basin was left to die and silenced. Although the Turkish state
has attempted to rebuild and revitalise the Church and Monastery of the Holy
Cross on Akdamar Island as a step towards peaceful dialogue, such initiatives
have been interpreted cosmetically, helping to legitimately render a large
number of unseen cultural artifacts legitimately invisible. This interpretation
is justified, given that there were a significant number of churches and
monasteries in the province of Van that were silenced and doomed to disappear.
There has been no significant effort since 1915 to identify, protect and
publicise the existence of Armenian material culture from a holistic
perspective.
If we refer to the current state of
the cultural heritage in the region, there are many artifacts that were used as
stables or destroyed due to treasure hunting activities. In addition, it is
known that there are many unexplored artifacts in areas under the control of
the security forces. Continuous military intervention irreversibly destroys the
common cultural heritage and common land, and within this context the common
future.
Although the problem of Armenian-Turkish
relations is known on a global scale, this issues’ social framework has been
handled on the axis of genocide, and no significant attempt has been made to
focus on the material culture and the sociality of the people living around it.
In this context, carrying out memory studies that consider cultural heritage as
a memory space, including the protection and restoration of historical and
cultural sites, should be among the issues of priority.
It is clear that a policy of
holistic conservation implemented in the region to protect the material culture
depends on political will at a macro level. However, instead of waiting for
such a will from above, there are many steps that can be taken from below. From
this point of view, under current conditions, it is very important to raise
awareness about the value these works express and the risks they face.